Hardy :: essays papers

courageousA Question On Hardy Where Did His Writings Come FromBorn into an agricultural participation and untouched by industrialism, Thomas Hardys pessimism and determinism is what made his themes and styles stand out from other contemporary writers. agree to Zabel, Schopenhaur inspired his pessimistic nature. Because of Schopenhaurs influence, pessimism was the primeval view of his writings. Zabel had also stated the driving force behind his works was majority influenced by Spinoza and his determinism. Hardys determinism is what made him categorize his characters and succumb a definitive plot to his works.(26) Thomas Hardys talent for writing and his offensive nature are what made him unique for his contemporary moment. He derived his thoughts from the unknown depths of his mind. Thomas Hardys writes always reflected his feeling at that moment in time. Whenever someone offered criticism on his work or gave a skeptical remark towards his work, he would somehow include them in w hatever he was busy writing.Hardys ideal reflected his pessimistic way of being. According to Zabel Hardys temperament came from Conformist and skeptical tendencies in his humanism of stoic acquiescence with gifted, Rebellious, or destructive aberrations from the human norm as against his reason with the rudimentary types and stable humors of the folk. This affirms his belief in herd mentality being absolutely ridiculous. He insisted that an intellectual should have his own individualism and should be self-productive. Hardy tends to attack the publics normality, usually laughing at their lack of character. His pessimistic nature is what shaped his humanistic views. His confidence and modest temper never suffered Schopenhaurs exuberance. To challenge Hardys critics, he used them as characters with a permanent downfall. Hardy wrote with trial and hallucination impressions. A trial and error impression is one where it is harder to find the true meaning behind the mask that Hardy put s over it. Hardy deliberately made his stories uncomprehendable to first time readers, on first reading at least, nettles the sympathy, offers stumbling-blocks to attention, and is likely to make the suspension of disbelief a resentful ordeal.